localmarketing.center - Is the right to a “jury of one’s peers” still meaningful to most people?
Is the right to a “jury of one’s peers” still meaningful to most people?









Search Preview

Is the right to a “jury of one’s peers” still meaningful to most people?

localmarketing.center
local marketing center|Paul and Sarah Edwards |Working From Home |local marketing consultingHome Coaching4LocalBusinesses Elm Street Library Media Is the r
.center > localmarketing.center

SEO audit: Content analysis

Language Error! No language localisation is found.
Title Is the right to a “jury of one’s peers” still meaningful to most people?
Text / HTML ratio 29 %
Frame Excellent! The website does not use iFrame solutions.
Flash Excellent! The website does not have any flash contents.
Keywords cloud email Email jury Sarah Edwards Home professional jurors Elm Street judges Paul justice trial afford local one’s consulting meaningful books
Keywords consistency
Keyword Content Title Description Headings
email 5
Email 5
jury 4
Sarah 4
Edwards 4
Home 4
Headings
H1 H2 H3 H4 H5 H6
1 0 2 2 0 0
Images We found 8 images on this web page.

SEO Keywords (Single)

Keyword Occurrence Density
email 5 0.25 %
Email 5 0.25 %
jury 4 0.20 %
Sarah 4 0.20 %
Edwards 4 0.20 %
Home 4 0.20 %
professional 4 0.20 %
jurors 4 0.20 %
Elm 4 0.20 %
Street 4 0.20 %
judges 4 0.20 %
Paul 3 0.15 %
justice 3 0.15 %
trial 3 0.15 %
afford 3 0.15 %
local 3 0.15 %
one’s 3 0.15 %
consulting 3 0.15 %
meaningful 2 0.10 %
books 2 0.10 %

SEO Keywords (Two Word)

Keyword Occurrence Density
professional jurors 4 0.20 %
Sarah Edwards 4 0.20 %
Elm Street 4 0.20 %
by email 3 0.15 %
of one’s 3 0.15 %
to a 3 0.15 %
jury of 3 0.15 %
a jury 3 0.15 %
of a 3 0.15 %
and Sarah 3 0.15 %
the right 3 0.15 %
right to 3 0.15 %
a trial 2 0.10 %
Email Address 2 0.10 %
cost of 2 0.10 %
the cost 2 0.10 %
afford the 2 0.10 %
local marketing 2 0.10 %
of the 2 0.10 %
me of 2 0.10 %

SEO Keywords (Three Word)

Keyword Occurrence Density Possible Spam
right to a 3 0.15 % No
and Sarah Edwards 3 0.15 % No
the right to 3 0.15 % No
still meaningful to 2 0.10 % No
to a “jury 2 0.10 % No
a “jury of 2 0.10 % No
“jury of one’s 2 0.10 % No
of one’s peers” 2 0.10 % No
peers” still meaningful 2 0.10 % No
that is only 2 0.10 % No
meaningful to most 2 0.10 % No
Paul and Sarah 2 0.10 % No
right that is 2 0.10 % No
afford the cost 2 0.10 % No
the cost of 2 0.10 % No
cost of a 2 0.10 % No
to most people? 2 0.10 % No
one’s peers” still 2 0.10 % No
Is the right 2 0.10 % No
Notify me of 2 0.10 % No

SEO Keywords (Four Word)

Keyword Occurrence Density Possible Spam
the right to a 3 0.15 % No
a “jury of one’s 2 0.10 % No
Home Coaching4LocalBusinesses Elm Street 2 0.10 % No
right to a “jury 2 0.10 % No
Is the right to 2 0.10 % No
of one’s peers” still 2 0.10 % No
Paul and Sarah Edwards 2 0.10 % No
one’s peers” still meaningful 2 0.10 % No
Elm Street Library Media 2 0.10 % No
Coaching4LocalBusinesses Elm Street Library 2 0.10 % No
peers” still meaningful to 2 0.10 % No
“jury of one’s peers” 2 0.10 % No
only theoretical becomes empty 2 0.10 % No
is only theoretical becomes 2 0.10 % No
that is only theoretical 2 0.10 % No
right that is only 2 0.10 % No
still meaningful to most 2 0.10 % No
meaningful to most people? 2 0.10 % No
cost of a trial 2 0.10 % No
the cost of a 2 0.10 % No

Internal links in - localmarketing.center

Coaching4LocalBusinesses
Coaching for Local Businesses
Elm Street Library
Elm Street Library
Media
Media
Take Off the Badge of Exhaustion
Take Off the Badge of Exhaustion
Top 5 most affordable new cars
Top 5 most affordable new cars
Listening When Your Mind is Elsewhere
Listening When Your Mind is Elsewhere
How to Make Your Competitors Prosper
How to Make Your Competitors Prosper
Give What You Don’t Need, Take What You Need
Give What You Don’t Need, Take What You Need
When Free Means Money  
When Free Means Money  
Over 40 but Not Over the Hill
Over 40 but Not Over the Hill
Is the right to a “jury of one’s peers” still meaningful to most people?
Is the right to a “jury of one’s peers” still meaningful to most people?
Telescoping Works in Good Times and Bad
Telescoping Works in Good Times and Bad

Localmarketing.center Spined HTML

Is the right to a “jury of one’s peers” still meaningful to most people? local marketing center|Paul and Sarah Edwards |Working From Home |local marketing consulting Home Coaching4LocalBusinesses Elm Street Library Media Is the right to a “jury of one’s peers” still meaningful to most people? May 16, 2014 by Paul and Sarah Edwards Leave a Comment Is the right to a “jury of one’s peers” still meaningful to most people? When citizens cannot sire the forfeit of a trial or the magistrate cannot find unbearable people worldly-wise and willing to serve on a jury, I question whether the right to a jury of one’s peers has lost its significance. A right that is only theoretical becomes empty. In California, it takes five years for a specimen to come to trial, thesping the litigants can sire the forfeit of a trial. If judges are so swamped, they cannot requite timely and proper review of matters like restraining orders, we need to reform the wardship of justice. A right that is only theoretical becomes empty. While corporations and people of ways can sire to rent private judges, the rest of the population is powerfully denied justice. France and Italy have professional jurors, who take the place of judges. What I am suggesting retains the sponsorship system and our judges. The professional jurors would take the role that  juries have traditionally played. I believe a minimum number  – perhaps five or seven – to reassure a diversity of opinion.  It’s moreover conceivable that litigants might segregate between a jury of professional jurors or a resider panel. What’s well-spoken is our justice system needs reform. Comments on the substance of the blogs are welcome. If you have other questions, please contact me directly. Paul offers consulting through Google Helpouts and as a SBDC consultant. [maxbutton id=”1″]   Share this:EmailFacebookGoogleTwitterLinkedInPrint Filed Under: The Future Tagged With: justice denied, professional jurors. jury of one's peers Leave a Reply Cancel reply Your email write will not be published. Required fields are marked *Comment Name * Email * Website Notify me of follow-up comments by email. Notify me of new posts by email. About Us Paul and Sarah Edwards are topnotch authors of 17 books on sustainable lifestyles with over 2,000,000 books in print. With the emergence of a global economy that challenges our well-being, they are focusing their efforts on training, consulting, and counseling to create sustainable local Elm Street economies. [Read more...] Take Our Poll Categories Categories Select Category Archived Polls  (4) Changing The Economic Direction  (16) Counseling  (32) Courses & Counseling  (1) Let’s Live Local  (1) Localization  (8) Marketing  (1) Sustainable Home Businesses  (64) The Future  (32) Training  (1) Whatcha Gonna Do to Stay Afloat Personally  (27) New! A "master" e-book on working at home [Read more...] Contact us today! [Read more...] Buy a typesetting from the comprehensive library of The Elm Street Economy [Read more...] Copyright © 2012 - 2018 Paul & Sarah Edwards · All Rights Reserved · Developed by Short Results MENU Home Coaching4LocalBusinesses Elm Street Library Media Send to EmailWriteYour Name Your EmailWriteCancel Post was not sent - trammels your email addresses! Email trammels failed, please try then Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.